Monday, February 8, 2010

Horoscopes

This can be continued from my previous post on Karma pahla.

Since tis accordin to the current situation that a persons horoscope is 'read', this allows for multiple interpretations

Different astrologers will read the 'signs' in a different manner according to their expertise. Butt, they are only giving their understanding of what the highest probability of things happenin (is/ can be).
For example, a certain astrologer may read a persons financial hardship karma to be played out with the person losing personal possessions, upon considering that persons current situation in life, status, positioning of stars and other shit. Another astrologer reading da same persons future may read the financial hardship karma to be played out by losing a loss of income earnings or whateva. Although tis the same persons same karma that is to be played out, the two astrologers are lending their expertise in reading the highest probability of what could happen to that person according to the signs, in each astrologers 'opinion'.
At a basic level it would be the financial hardship karma that they are trying to interpret for the person. Peeps who go to astrologers should not expect the 'exact prediction' from them. After all, all experienced personal reality is self created through the filter of free will. Thats how different astrologers will give different interpretations on the most probable occurenece of a persons future accordin to them. Each person using their free will can redefine how that karma is supposed to play out, making different realities possible. If you had gone to another 'better' astrologer, that bugger may have told u whats going to happen more accurately having 'nuff expertise to judge how u will use ur free will depending on what u want your future to be like.

Wednesday, February 3, 2010

Karma pahla question

Sri Tulsidas said: "Our destiny was shaped long before the body came into being."

Could it be right dat tis our body dat carries out the physical realization of dat destiny? Butt cos tis a physical realization in da current world, can we influence it with our free will

For example, if there is a certain amount of negative karma to be carried out by a soul, it would be different the way da person will have to act out dat particular karma according to his or her current physical reality aight. For example, through hard work n all dat shit or whateva, a certain soul has become a doctor. Another soul who had similar overall opportunities n shit didn't exercise his free will towards that cause n does some other shit n turns out to be a gangsta. Now say these souls were both supposed to live out 'equal amount' of karma related to financial hardship. Maybe the doctor may have to experience 'financial hardship' in a sense created by that self! Da gangsta may have to experience 'financial hardship' in a physical environment created by his gansta-self followin the same principle.
Here although it is da 'same' karma dat has played out, cos of free will, da doctor has created an environment where he would ride out da same karma on an relatively (and absolutely? as well) lesser 'physically demanding' level innit?

U don't need to leave your comments cos I know ur worried about saying somethin that seems less intelligent n all :)

Thursday, January 21, 2010

Back after a bang

Have been away from bloggin for a bit n it feels good to get back n check wtf has been goin on in da Lankan blogsphere. True dat I've stayed away from bein part of it cos I'm too evolved n all, but tis still worth checkin it to get a good laugh aight. I use the excuse that I'm checkin da pulse of the bloggas for the sake of monitorin current web collective consciousness. After all even dis shit contributes to web chatter, n I've given a sermon on what can happen due to that before as well.
Don't feel bad if ur part of Kottu. Just da fact dat ur here sets u apart from da rest of the fools cos tis only the destiny of those on the path to self actualisation that visit mi shit :) As surprised as u may not be to find out u are on the right track.

Being part of the bloggin network kind of plugs u in to a created reality. Readin some of the blogs proves this. Through bloggin, some people are creating another reality that can be distinct from 'normal' life experience (depending on da wants of the person, of course).
Butt even if the thought of experiencin existence on multiple realities is pretty allurin', I haven't tried cybersex cos I have a hunch it might be boring.

Wednesday, January 13, 2010

Bitter sweet lies

Even da best peeps fall for it.
Whats life without 'em chix? It goes beyond good poonani when u think someone is nice aight.
Just cos u think their wholesome, dats different from being innocent. Just cos ur in to someone doesn't suddenly make either saints.

When there is this 'understandin scene goin on, u just tend to try to not hurt them as much as possible.
Truth sets u free. U have to tell them da truth cos dats the way.
What about if facts were from the before n the reality we will create after may be more palatable? Makes sense to just snap out a 'whitie' (lie, I mean; not to knock out a jismo, for those of yawl who are thick- and from dat I don't mean thick as in jismo thick).
Bitter from regretable past sweet 'nuff for 'er to believe butt lies.

Do it if u want. I'm not sure whether its highly evolved tho'